Steve Cooper
MANY anglers keep a journal or diary of their fishing. A diary gives the angler a history of what happened, an opportunity to reflect, and hopefully a crystal ball into the future.
Most of us believe that history, at least when it comes to fish movements, will repeat.
If you are not right, then at least you can say you were guessing with some authority.
Moreover, when someone says the fishing isn’t as good as it was 20 years ago, you can turn to your diary and make an assessment based on the written word, rather than a badly chaffed memory.
Don’t be surprised if you find the fishing has improved.
When I began keeping a fishing diary, there was a tendency to write more than necessary. After a few years, the trips become shorter, at least in words. The flowery prose gave way to factual information.
To that end, the diarists among us keep notes and list the factors we think are important - things like tide, wind, barometer, bait used and, always, moon phase.
Saltwater anglers can become obsessed by the moon.
Some prefer the new moon for snapper, and the full moon for bream and gummy sharks.
In the freshwater, anglers appear more interested in barometer readings, especially in lakes but also on rivers where native species like Murray cod are being sought.
I believe fish react to outside influences, and that the same rules do not necessarily apply to all waters, or the same fish wherever they are caught.
Sometimes, though, you come across a recurring sequence that seems to indicate when and where certain species will come on the chew.
Time and tide are considerations for thinking salt-water anglers, and the overriding influence on tide is the moon.
Therefore, whether you think moon phases or tides, you are still thinking in lunar terms.
Even many freshwater anglers will fish only when the moon is down, or on the dark side.
Lunar cycles play an important role on the habits of fish; defining that role is difficult.
Next to the sea, the moon is the strongest primeval urge in us.
Science has proven that some living organisms respond to the moon’s phases.
The feeding cycle of oysters is influenced by lunar change, and fiddler crabs change colour according to the moon.
Theorising about fishing is easy, but as most anglers probably realise, fish are not always predictable. It’s what keeps us coming back.
Most anglers have reasons as to why fish bite better at certain times on certain baits.
But for all the theory, fish don’t always co-operate and coming up with a logical answer why fish don’t do what they are supposed to do is the hard part.
Anglers regarded as experts by their peers don’t always know the real reasons behind a hot bite, or lack of bites.
Experts are those anglers who have just experienced a hot bite and caught plenty.
The fact that any fish were caught could have been either a stroke of luck or pure genius.
The big question lies in discovering why and when fish can be expected to bite.
In the late 1960s, John Alden Knight’s Solunar Tables became available in Australia.
Knight believed there were major and minor periods of activity when fish were more likely to feed, and this was due to the moon: its phase and proximity to the Earth and the position of the sun at the same time.
It was a complicated theory but one I followed through with regularity for a few years by keeping a diary of my fishing with the relevant lunar notes.
There was some merit in Knight’s predictions.
Melbourne computer guru Tim Smith has come up with a similar theory and put out a small booklet called Tim Smith’s Solar & Lunar Fishing and Hunting Times 2009.
If you are into moon phases and fish predictions, and want to maintain a diary, then the Anglers Journal & Almanac, which contains Tim’s lunar predictions as well as other information including tide charts and journal entry pages, is worth a look.
Anglers Journal & Almanac is published by the Australian Fishing Network, RRP: $24.99.
* Steve Cooper can be heard on the Casting Off program on Radio Sport927 between 4.30am and 6.30am on Saturdays.
Source : Weekly Times